Appellant and non-prisoner, Joanna Burke, pro se, moves this court for an extension of 30 days to file for rehearing in this appeal. This is not for the purposes of delay, but relies upon recent high-profile venue-related case, currently batting between the Fifth Circuit, the Northern District Court in Texas and the DC District Court…. Continue reading
Posts Tagged → Burke v PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
Texas Federal Judge Does Not Dismiss Bankers Case, But Transfers to DC under 1404(a)
OPINION & ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Transfer. ECF No. 52. Having considered the Parties’ briefs and applicable law, the Court finds the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (“D.D.C”). BACKGROUND The Chamber of… Continue reading
Minnesota District Court and Eighth Circuit Discrimination versus S.D. New York Chief Judge Laura Swain
Irrefutable Evidence of Discrimination in Federal and Appellate Courts against an 85-year old widow.
Continue readingThe Solo Appeal (with Updates)
ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION BY CA8 (Apr. 1, 2024) Joanna Burke files for 3-panel review of ORDER granting extension to remove one sentence; RECONSIDERATION AND/OR CORRECTION OF APPELLANT JOANNA BURKE’s SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Appellant and non-prisoner, Joanna Burke, pro se, moves this court for reconsideration and/or correction of this court’s order granting of… Continue reading
Wrong or [W]right: Dishonest Federal Judges Will Act Maliciously and Corruptly
This opinion is replete with unadulterated falsehoods. Plaintiff Joanna Burke filed objections to the R&R. For the reasons stated below, the Court overrules the objections, adopts the R&R, and dismisses the complaint without prejudice. This matter is before the Court on the August 30, 2023 Report and Recommendation from FORMER COUNSEL FOR PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,… Continue reading
Venue is Not Grounds for Dismissal
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHULTZ “When judges sacrifice the rule of law to find rights they favor, I fear the people may one day find that their new rights, once proclaimed so boldly, have disappeared because there is no longer a rule of law to protect them.”[1] THE… Continue reading
Res Judicata: Another Judicial Whiteout Opinion, this time from Minnesota Federal Court
Magistrate Judge David Schultz one page and a bit Report and Recommendation is a Whiteout Lyin’ Opinion.
Continue readingObstruction of Justice
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE “When judges sacrifice the rule of law to find rights they favor, I fear the people may one day find that their new rights, once proclaimed so boldly, have disappeared because there is no longer a rule of law to protect them.”[1] PREAMBLE This legal proceeding represents… Continue reading
Show Cause Order: Magistrate Judge Dolce Foster Targets Venue
Plaintiff Joanna Burke has been litigating issues concerning the validity of her mortgage for over a decade in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [sic, Fifth Circuit]. Ms. Burke now seeks to continue that fight here, suing her mortgage… Continue reading
Interlocutory Appeal Certification by Pro Se Plaintiff to Correct Manifest Errors
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CERTIFY DISPOSITIVE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Pro se, non-prisoner Joanna Burke (“Plaintiff”) submits this Brief in Support of her Motion to Certify Dispositive Issue for Interlocutory Appeal and Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal for the following reasons: BACKGROUND On July 17, 2023,… Continue reading
Response to Motion: Order by Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster on 7/17/2023. (JC)
(Text-Only) Order: In her [8] Motion for Advance Approval of Process of Service Costs and Extension of Time to Serve Defendant, Plaintiff seeks an order for prepayment of service costs, and also seeks a 90-day extension of the time to serve Defendants. The Court DENIES the Motion IN PART. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2) provides… Continue reading
Texas Officers of the Court Slighting Waiver of Service
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ MOTION FOR ADVANCE APPROVAL OF PROCESS OF SERVICE COSTS AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2), Joanna Burke (“Plaintiff”) files this motion and states as follows: WAIVER OF PROCESS ATTEMPTS On paper submission of the Plaintiff’s complaint to this court, copies were sent to the… Continue reading