St. Louis Office | Eighth Circuit | United States Court of Appeals (uscourts.gov) ORDER If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not… Continue reading
This opinion is replete with unadulterated falsehoods. Plaintiff Joanna Burke filed objections to the R&R. For the reasons stated below, the Court overrules the objections, adopts the R&R, and dismisses the complaint without prejudice. This matter is before the Court on the August 30, 2023 Report and Recommendation from FORMER COUNSEL FOR PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION,… Continue reading
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ OBJECTION TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHULTZ “When judges sacrifice the rule of law to find rights they favor, I fear the people may one day find that their new rights, once proclaimed so boldly, have disappeared because there is no longer a rule of law to protect them.”[1] THE… Continue reading
Magistrate Judge David Schultz one page and a bit Report and Recommendation is a Whiteout Lyin’ Opinion.
Continue reading
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE “When judges sacrifice the rule of law to find rights they favor, I fear the people may one day find that their new rights, once proclaimed so boldly, have disappeared because there is no longer a rule of law to protect them.”[1] PREAMBLE This legal proceeding represents… Continue reading
Plaintiff Joanna Burke has been litigating issues concerning the validity of her mortgage for over a decade in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [sic, Fifth Circuit]. Ms. Burke now seeks to continue that fight here, suing her mortgage… Continue reading
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CERTIFY DISPOSITIVE INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING APPEAL Pro se, non-prisoner Joanna Burke (“Plaintiff”) submits this Brief in Support of her Motion to Certify Dispositive Issue for Interlocutory Appeal and Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal for the following reasons: BACKGROUND On July 17, 2023,… Continue reading
(Text-Only) Order: In her [8] Motion for Advance Approval of Process of Service Costs and Extension of Time to Serve Defendant, Plaintiff seeks an order for prepayment of service costs, and also seeks a 90-day extension of the time to serve Defendants. The Court DENIES the Motion IN PART. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2) provides… Continue reading
PLAINTIFF, JOANNA BURKES’ MOTION FOR ADVANCE APPROVAL OF PROCESS OF SERVICE COSTS AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE DEFENDANTS Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(2), Joanna Burke (“Plaintiff”) files this motion and states as follows: WAIVER OF PROCESS ATTEMPTS On paper submission of the Plaintiff’s complaint to this court, copies were sent to the… Continue reading